Difference between revisions of "Archive:Open University Campaign/OCW"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(Resources)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* [http://wiki.freeculture.org/images/d/d1/OCW_Proposal.pdf Kevin Donovan's Georgetown Proposal]
 
* [http://wiki.freeculture.org/images/d/d1/OCW_Proposal.pdf Kevin Donovan's Georgetown Proposal]
 
* [http://www.ocwconsortium.org/share/toolkit.html OCW Consortium's Toolkit for implementing OCW]
 
* [http://www.ocwconsortium.org/share/toolkit.html OCW Consortium's Toolkit for implementing OCW]
 +
* [[Copyright Howto For Professors]]
  
 
== Reading ==
 
== Reading ==

Revision as of 02:08, 24 January 2009

Open University Campaign Criteria #2: OpenCourseWare

For a good definition of open educational resources, see point 2 of the Cape Town Open Education Declaration.

Committee Steps

-Draft a one page document outlining the importance of OpenCourseWare (OCW Consortium is a huge help)

-Determine what makes an "A" for OCW - is it at least 10 courses (like the OCWC requires) or is it all of their courses (like MIT does)? Is it text-based or do videos get extra points? What about providing multiple forms of access and mirroring?

Resources

Reading