Difference between revisions of "Archive:2008-02-25"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(Slimming the Bureaucracy)
(my comments on the agenda)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
===Slimming the Bureaucracy===
 
===Slimming the Bureaucracy===
 
Why is there so much bureaucracy?
 
Why is there so much bureaucracy?
 +
: Quick answer is we tried operating SFC without any serious structure for a long time, and ultimately it burned everyone out and things fell apart. The Bylaws now clearly state who has the ability to make decisions on the global level and how they may do so.  After a long period of time in which nobody had responsibility or accountability, and repeated failures of e.g. the consensus decision-making model (whenever we failed to reach consensus, nothing got done), I think that a little structure and bureaucracy is necessary.  Trust me, I'm a Quaker with anarchist sympathies, I like consensus and flat/nonexistent structures as much as anyone, but I think it's frequently hard to do things that way when doing activism across several time zones with people you've never met.--[[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 01:02, 26 February 2008 (JST)
  
 +
===Wiki overhaul/maintenance===
 
i'd like to discuss the idea of creating a team to manage the website content, specifically the wiki.  with the new wiki skin, we have the ability to extend our web presence considerably, but we need people to keep the info on here up to date. This might be more appropriate for the volunteers team than for the core team, but i'd still like to at least touch upon this.  -Parker
 
i'd like to discuss the idea of creating a team to manage the website content, specifically the wiki.  with the new wiki skin, we have the ability to extend our web presence considerably, but we need people to keep the info on here up to date. This might be more appropriate for the volunteers team than for the core team, but i'd still like to at least touch upon this.  -Parker
 +
:I think we want to wait until we have a lot more volunteers before we start splitting them up into teams again... in the near future, I think we'll just have a single "volunteers" team to cover all volunteer work (aside from perhaps the web team).--[[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 01:02, 26 February 2008 (JST)
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
  
 
[[Category:Meetings]]
 
[[Category:Meetings]]

Revision as of 16:02, 25 February 2008

This is a Core Team meeting.

Agenda

Attendance/introductions

Who's taking minutes?

Goals for the semester

Where do we want SFC to be by the summer?

Brainstorm 5 internal projects that should get done in the near future

Also brainstorm at least a couple "next actions" for each project.

Anyone wanna be chair or vice-chair?

Someone could practice chairing the next meeting if they want and nobody objects.

Slimming the Bureaucracy

Why is there so much bureaucracy?

Quick answer is we tried operating SFC without any serious structure for a long time, and ultimately it burned everyone out and things fell apart. The Bylaws now clearly state who has the ability to make decisions on the global level and how they may do so. After a long period of time in which nobody had responsibility or accountability, and repeated failures of e.g. the consensus decision-making model (whenever we failed to reach consensus, nothing got done), I think that a little structure and bureaucracy is necessary. Trust me, I'm a Quaker with anarchist sympathies, I like consensus and flat/nonexistent structures as much as anyone, but I think it's frequently hard to do things that way when doing activism across several time zones with people you've never met.--Nelson 01:02, 26 February 2008 (JST)

Wiki overhaul/maintenance

i'd like to discuss the idea of creating a team to manage the website content, specifically the wiki. with the new wiki skin, we have the ability to extend our web presence considerably, but we need people to keep the info on here up to date. This might be more appropriate for the volunteers team than for the core team, but i'd still like to at least touch upon this. -Parker

I think we want to wait until we have a lot more volunteers before we start splitting them up into teams again... in the near future, I think we'll just have a single "volunteers" team to cover all volunteer work (aside from perhaps the web team).--Nelson 01:02, 26 February 2008 (JST)

Minutes