Difference between revisions of "Archive:2005-01-03"
From FreeCulture.org
Gavinbaker (talk | contribs) m (Fixed bulleting) |
Gavinbaker (talk | contribs) m (Whoops, fixed bulleting again) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
***EFF, PK, and CC were all pretty much agreed on. Other orgs considered: Downhill Battle, FSF, open access org | ***EFF, PK, and CC were all pretty much agreed on. Other orgs considered: Downhill Battle, FSF, open access org | ||
***There seem to be two models of external contacts: Long-standing relationships and briefer, more informal relationships. We didn't decide which of these our four contacts should be. | ***There seem to be two models of external contacts: Long-standing relationships and briefer, more informal relationships. We didn't decide which of these our four contacts should be. | ||
| − | + | *Other | |
**This AIM chat had a ton of lagging. Additionally, Nelson (and possibly others) were kicked for "scrolling." That's not acceptable. The obvious alternative is IRC. IRC has its own problems though -- primarily, certain campus networks e.g. [http://www.ufl.edu/ Florida] don't allow IRC. | **This AIM chat had a ton of lagging. Additionally, Nelson (and possibly others) were kicked for "scrolling." That's not acceptable. The obvious alternative is IRC. IRC has its own problems though -- primarily, certain campus networks e.g. [http://www.ufl.edu/ Florida] don't allow IRC. | ||
**The FC.o servers have been testy lately. A problem? | **The FC.o servers have been testy lately. A problem? | ||
Revision as of 06:38, 4 January 2005
3 Jan 2005, AOL Instant Messenger chat
- Spring_2005_Strategy_Paper
- Organization of strategy paper
- We should use the system suggested by Gavin on Talk:Spring_2005_Strategy_Paper
- One-time national concerns
- Ongoing national concerns
- Campaigns
- Suggestions for locals
- Some say this doesn't belong in the strategy paper, but rather in a separate running list of suggestions. Some say if there's national coordination, they do belong in the strategy paper. This was not resolved in the chat.
- We should use the system suggested by Gavin on Talk:Spring_2005_Strategy_Paper
- External contacts
- We settled on establishing relationships with three groups at this time
- EFF (liasons: Andy and Nelson)
- CC (Steve and Arthur)
- PK (Nelson and "David Chudzicki from Swat"? Has this been resolved?)
- Mozilla Foundation (Nick)
- We should explore what other organizations we might collaborate with, but for now we're starting small.
- EFF, PK, and CC were all pretty much agreed on. Other orgs considered: Downhill Battle, FSF, open access org
- There seem to be two models of external contacts: Long-standing relationships and briefer, more informal relationships. We didn't decide which of these our four contacts should be.
- We settled on establishing relationships with three groups at this time
- Organization of strategy paper
- Other
- This AIM chat had a ton of lagging. Additionally, Nelson (and possibly others) were kicked for "scrolling." That's not acceptable. The obvious alternative is IRC. IRC has its own problems though -- primarily, certain campus networks e.g. Florida don't allow IRC.
- The FC.o servers have been testy lately. A problem?
- Nelson wants a draft of the external policy paper available by Thursday.
- Scheduled conference call for 4 Jan to finish strategy paper and begin policy paper
Minutes by Gavin, logs by Rebekah
